My three questions (No.94 to No. 96) on the 32nd day in the current series to Transport Minister Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat on the RM12.5 billion Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) scandal today are: Question No. 1: Ong, who had to abscond all the way to Paris to avoid ministerial accountability to Parliament for... »
Archive for June, 2009
PKFZ scandal – why has OKT changed so much in 8 short months after becoming MCA President?
Tuesday, June 30th, 2009
PKA defers RM660m payment for PKFZ
Tuesday, June 30th, 2009
PORT KLANG (June 30, 2009) : At the risk of legal action, the Port Klang Authority (PKA) will not pay RM660 million to turnkey contractor Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd (KDSB) for the RM4.6 billion Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) project, pending a review of the findings of a special task force probing the controversial... »
Ong Tee Keat has won the right to get into Guinness Book of Records twice, the second time for being the first MCA President in 60 years to be on the run, from Parliament and outside, on a national scandal
Monday, June 29th, 2009
My three questions (No.91 to No. 93) on the 31st day in the current series) to Transport Minister Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat on the RM12.5 billion Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) scandal today are: Question No. 1 – In response to my challenge to him yesterday to five public debates on the RM12.5 billion... »
Challenge to OTK to five public debates on the RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal where he could be assisted by five former Transport Ministers and five former PKA Chairmen
Sunday, June 28th, 2009
My three questions (No.88 to No. 90 on the 30th day in the current series) to Transport Minister Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat on the RM12.5 billion Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) scandal today are: Question No. 1: Speaking at the MCA Subang Division Delegates Meeting last night, Ong accused me of repeatedly telling lies... »
Does Ong agree that Parliamentary Standing Orders be amended to bar Deputy Ministers from replying in Parliament, making it compulsory for Ministers to personally respond on behalf of government?
Sunday, June 28th, 2009
My three questions (No.85 to No. 87 on the 29th day in the current series) to Transport Minister Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat on the RM12.5 billion Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) scandal today are: Question No. 1: Why is Ong continuing to evade the issue that up to now despite two weeks of parliamentary... »
PKFZ scandal: Does Ong Tee Keat agree that the Speaker has put the cart before the horse in claiming that there is no point in tabling PwC report on PKFZ and appendices in Parliament without PAC report?
Friday, June 26th, 2009
My three questions (No.82 to No. 84 on the 28th day in the current series) to Transport Minister Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat on the RM12.5 billion Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) scandal today are: Question No. 1: The Star today reported the Speaker, Tan Sri Pandikar Amin as saying that the PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) report... »
RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal – the great expose in Parliament
Thursday, June 25th, 2009
Part 1 — Najib’s achilles heel Part 2 — BN’s crisis of confidence : BN leaders have eyes that see not, ears that hear not, mouth that speak not or talk rubbish. »
RM12.5 billiion PKFZ scandal – Parliament entitled to know the reasons why the Cabinet chopped and changed week-by-week its decision in October/November 2002 on the PKFZ land issue
Thursday, June 25th, 2009
Today’s Star under the report “PKFZ probe under wraps for now” reads: Malaysian Anti-Corruption (MACC) is not obliged to disclose the progress of investigations into the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). PAC member William Leong (PKR-Selayang) said MACC Commissioner had informed the... »
PKFZ scandal – Is OTK so useless he cannot ensure that the 300 copies of PwC report and appendices on RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal are tabled in Parliament on Monday
Thursday, June 25th, 2009
My three questions (No.79 to No. 81 on the 27th day in the current series) to Transport Minister Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat on the RM12.5 billion Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) scandal today are: Question No. 1: This is the end of the second week of Parliament, which will adjourn next Thursday on 2nd... »